The correspondence in this collection consists, for the most part, of letters written by George Rountree to his son George, Jr., while the latter was attending Harvard (1921-1925). Although much of the material contained in the correspondence is personal in nature, the elder Rountree often included comments on the political, commercial, and social events of the period covered.
From a legal standpoint, he discusses a controversy raging in North Carolina in 1922 over incursions made by out-of-state Menhaden fisheries, a 1923 incident of railroad labor violence in North Carolina and a resulting murder trial, and his own complaints about the profession of railroad lawyers. He comments on the tariff question in one letter (1922) and makes reference to a letter which he wrote to Senator Furnifold M. Simmons and which he says was reprinted in part by the
News and Observer (Raleigh). In another letter (1923) Rountree records quite frankly his views on democracy, aristocracy, and government in the antebellum South. Late in 1924 he discusses the loss by theDemocrats of the presidential election and comments upon the effects in the South of Charles W. Bryan's vice presidential candidacy.
A reference is made to the accommodations and atmosphere of the Sir Walter Hotel, Raleigh, North Carolina, a new structure when Rountree stayed in it in 1924. Several references are made to a legal controversy aroused when the town of Kinston, N.C., first attempted to install city water (1923).
Copies of a letter from W. N. H. Smith to George Davis and one from Governor Zebulon B. Vance to George Davis are attached to a 1923 letter. The letters involved the appointment of Davis (Rountree's father-in-law) to the North Carolina Supreme Court (1878) and his decision to decline the appointment.
The collection contains one copy of the Annual Report of King's Crosstie Company of New York (1924), which details experiments being conducted by the county in the use of "permanent" crossties. V. R. C. King, President of the company, was Rountree's son-in-law.