Articles in regional publications that pertain to a wide range of North Carolina-related topics.
Search Results
26 results
for "Family Law Bulletin"
Currently viewing results 16 - 26
| Previous |
PAGE
OF 2
|
Record #:
19867
Author(s):
Abstract:
This bulletin compiles and discusses family law cases and legislation filed or enacted between February 1, and July 1, 2003.
Source:
Subject(s):
Full Text:
Record #:
19868
Author(s):
Abstract:
This bulletin reviews the development of the law in North Carolina regarding equitable distribution actions after the death of a party and to identify the applicable time limitations for pursuing a claim for equitable distribution following the death of a spouse.
Source:
Full Text:
Record #:
19866
Author(s):
Abstract:
This bulletin compiles and discusses family law cases decided between June 1, 2002, and February 1, 2003.
Source:
Subject(s):
Full Text:
Record #:
19863
Author(s):
Abstract:
This bulletin compiles and discusses family law cases decided between October 1, 2001 and March 1, 2002.
Source:
Subject(s):
Full Text:
Record #:
19862
Author(s):
Abstract:
This bulletin discusses a set of rules established by the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act and the Full Faith and Credit for Child Support Orders Act to \"reconcile\" multiple child support orders entered by different courts with respect to a parent's obligation to support a particular child, children, or family, and to recognize one as the controlling order with respect to a parent's duty to support a particular child or family.
Source:
Subject(s):
Full Text:
Record #:
25889
Author(s):
Abstract:
In response to the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act and increasing problems caused by conflicting orders in interstate child support cases, Congress enacted the Full Faith and Credit for Child Support Orders Act. Saxon summarizes the provisions of this act and its effect on North Carolina courts ability to recognize and enforce interstate and out of state child support orders.
Source:
Subject(s):
Record #:
25892
Author(s):
Abstract:
The nature of interstate child support cases is complex regarding issues of jurisdiction, choice of laws, remedies, and practical problems deal with processing and communications. Given the increasing complexity and inherent difficulties in such cases, the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) has been replaced with the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA). Also enacted in North Carolina, the law provides for better support and enforcement of provisions across state-lines.
Source:
Subject(s):
Record #:
16147
Author(s):
Abstract:
This bulletin discusses the present state of the law in North Carolina concerning the common law and constitutional rights of parents to the exclusive care, custody and control of their children. The article examines how that parental right impacts the authority of North Carolina courts to apply the best interest standard to resolve custody and visitation claims brought by third parties against parents. In addition, it reviews statutory and case law dealing specifically with grandparents to determine whether custody and visitation claims by grandparents are treated differently from claims by other third parties.
Source:
Full Text:
Record #:
19870
Author(s):
Abstract:
This bulletin discusses the present state of the law in North Carolina concerning the common law and constitutional right of parents to the exclusive care, custody and control of their children. The article examines how parental right impacts the authority of North Carolina courts to apply the best interest standard to resolve custody and visitation claims brought by third parties against parents.
Source:
Full Text:
Record #:
19871
Author(s):
Abstract:
This bulletin examines who is, and who isn't in a IV-D proceeding; whether a custodial parent is, or may become, a party in a IV-D proceeding; whether the IV-D agency that initiates, institutes, takes up, or pursues a paternity or child support proceeding does so on behalf of the custodial parent who is the agency's client or acts on behalf of and for the benefit of the county or State; why it is important to determine who is and isn't a party in IV-D proceedings; and what it means to be a party in a IV-D proceeding.\r\n
Source:
Subject(s):
Full Text:
Record #:
6725
Author(s):
Abstract:
\"Recent social, scientific, and legal developments -- including the higher prevalence of nonmarital births, the ability to determine parentage through genetic testing, new techniques for assisted reproduction, and the visibility of same-sex couples who are or want to be parents -- have forced legislators and courts to reexamine how the law determines whether an individual is the parent of a child and what legal rights and obligations arise as a result of the parent-child relationship.\" Saxon describes how North Carolina law addresses parentage in light of these new developments and compares these laws with the recently revised Uniform Parentage Act of 1973.
Source:
Subject(s):
Full Text: