Search Results

1 result for Trial testimony
Currently viewing results 1 - 1
PAGE 1 OF 1
Record #:
20389
Author(s):
Sendor, Benjamin B.
Abstract:
The NC Supreme Court has held in State v. Peoples (1984) that hypnotically refreshed testimony, testimony about the hypnotic session, and a videotape recording of the hypnotic session are inadmissible in a criminal trial. Thus the Court overturned its earlier decision in State v. McQueen (1978). This memorandum will discuss Peoples and its effect on trial testimony and law enforcement practices.
Source:
Administration of Justice Memorandum (NoCar KFN 7908 .A15 U6), Vol. Issue 2, Feb 1985, p1-3, f
Subject(s):
Hypnotically refreshed testimony; Trial testimony
Print View