NCPI Workmark
Articles in regional publications that pertain to a wide range of North Carolina-related topics.

Search Results


6 results for "Parole--North Carolina"
Currently viewing results 1 - 6
PAGE OF 1
Record #:
23212
Author(s):
Abstract:
Bruce Thomas, after serving 17 years in prison and 17 years of parole, explains how he struggled because of the constraints of his parole but how he has improved his life and finally gotten out of the system.
Source:
Indy Week (NoCar Oversize AP 2 .I57), Vol. 32 Issue 9, March 2015, p7, por Periodical Website
Full Text:
Record #:
28145
Author(s):
Abstract:
Bo Lozoff is the founder of Kindness House and former director of the Human Kindness Foundation. The foundation practiced interfaith prison ministry and the Kindness House was an spiritual living community for parolees. Lozoff is facing allegations that he sexually abused former program volunteers and parolees and bullied and intimidated other community members. Former volunteers, parolees, Lozoff, Departments of Corrections, and religious studies experts are interviewed and talk about the allegations. Lozoff has decided to close the parole program due to his unconventional sexual behavior, but is still mentoring inmates and actively ministering.
Source:
Independent Weekly (NoCar Oversize AP 2 .I57 [volumes 13 - 23 on microfilm]), Vol. 25 Issue 35, August 2008, p14-20 Periodical Website
Record #:
29941
Author(s):
Abstract:
This is a review of the current laws and rules regarding service of sentences that can be imposed under present North Carolina law. Also discussed are details and conditions of good time, gain time, and parole eligibility.
Source:
Record #:
18242
Author(s):
Abstract:
Parole offers inmates a chance to reenter society, a practice thought to emphasize the rehabilitation of criminals. The North Carolina Parole Commission determines the eligibility of an offender for parole. How the commission functions, who participates, and decision-making are all responsibilities of the commission and are described in detail.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 46 Issue 2, Fall 1980, p41-47
Record #:
29970
Author(s):
Abstract:
In Martinez v. California, the United States Supreme Court considered the extent to which state parole officials may be sued and required to pay damages to compensate citizens injured by parole inmates. This memorandum discusses the decision and its significance for parole officials in North Carolina.
Source:
Record #:
18190
Abstract:
Parole in North Carolina is the release of a prison inmate after a portion of their sentence has been served. Justification for parole lies in the probability that the offender has been rehabilitated. The concept of parole has undergone much change and some outspoken critics have questioned the effectiveness of the parole system.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 40 Issue 2, Fall 1974, p53-57