NCPI Workmark
Articles in regional publications that pertain to a wide range of North Carolina-related topics.

Search Results


72 results for "Education--Laws and legislation"
Currently viewing results 46 - 60
Previous
PAGE OF 5
Next
Record #:
6537
Author(s):
Abstract:
Joyce discusses laws passed by the 2003 North Carolina General Assembly pertaining to higher education, including appropriations and salaries, university community college governance, and financial aid.
Source:
Record #:
6539
Author(s):
Abstract:
Joyce discusses laws passed by the 2003 North Carolina General Assembly pertaining to higher education, including appropriations and salaries, university and community college governance, and financial aid.
Source:
Full Text:
Record #:
6836
Author(s):
Abstract:
During the 2002-03 school year, all North Carolina public schools were evaluated for the first time under the state's ABC's of Public Education of 1996 and the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. An interesting result was that almost half of the schools that met state standards failed to meet federal standards. Stallings discusses whether or not the state's assessment program meets the requirements of the new federal legislation; the first year assessment results and if the state's results met federal expectations; what sanctions will the state face because of the results; and will North Carolina be able to meet the new standards in the time the federal act allots.
Source:
North Carolina Insight (NoCar JK 4101 N3x), Vol. 21 Issue 3, Aug 2004, p32-52, 54-57, il, f Periodical Website
Full Text:
Record #:
7010
Author(s):
Abstract:
The North Carolina General Assembly made only a few significant changes to public elementary and secondary school law during this year. The assembly's highest profile issue was the revision of the public school calendar. Other issues dealt with finance, purchasing and contracting, student health, and criminal law.
Source:
Full Text:
Record #:
7537
Abstract:
Two significant events concerning public school funding occurred in the summer of 2005. The North Carolina General Assembly approved a long-contested educational lottery, and the North Carolina Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSN V. MOORE. This ruling resulted in a $120 million budget allocation to the public schools from the state's Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund. Denning discusses these two events.
Source:
Local Government Law Bulletin (NoCar KFN 7830 A15 L6), Vol. Issue 108, Nov 2005, p1-10, f
Full Text:
Record #:
7824
Author(s):
Abstract:
Mesibov and Joyce summarize legislation passed by the 2005 North Carolina General Assembly affecting public education in the state. One of the most important pieces of legislation was the passage of the lottery act and the creation of the Education Lottery Fund. Other legislation included finance, instructional issues, expanding opportunities for students, cooperative efforts to help students, and health issues.
Source:
School Law Bulletin (NoCar K 23 C33), Vol. 36 Issue 3, Summer 2005, p1-13, il
Full Text:
Record #:
7825
Author(s):
Abstract:
Money for higher education remained tight in the 2005 North Carolina General Assembly. There was only a slight rise in funding for the University of North Carolina and Community College systems. Joyce discusses the assembly's actions as they apply to appropriations and salaries, purchasing and contracting, student relationships and financial aid, and university and community college governance.
Source:
School Law Bulletin (NoCar K 23 C33), Vol. 36 Issue 3, Summer 2005, p14-20, f
Full Text:
Record #:
7980
Abstract:
Denning analyzes the North Carolina Supreme Court's 2005 decision interpreting the fines and forfeitures provision of Article IX, Section 7 of the North Carolina Constitution. that states the proceeds of all penalties and forfeitures and of all fines collected shall be used exclusively for maintaining free public schools.
Source:
School Law Bulletin (NoCar K 23 C33), Vol. 36 Issue 4, Fall 2005, p1-9, f
Full Text:
Record #:
9429
Author(s):
Abstract:
After several lean years of funding for the University of North Carolina and Community College systems, the 2006 General Assembly increased funding for the UNC System by 12 percent and the Community College System by 15 percent. Joyce discusses the assembly's actions as they apply to appropriations and salaries, student relationships and financial aid, and university and community college governance.
Source:
Full Text:
Record #:
9430
Author(s):
Abstract:
Mesibov and Joyce discuss educational legislation of the 2006 North Carolina General Assembly, including appropriations; student issues that include students with disabilities, pregnant and parenting students, and the schoolchildren's health act; and miscellaneous legislation, including More At Four and Office of School Readiness.
Source:
Full Text:
Record #:
10253
Author(s):
Abstract:
Mesibov and Joyce discuss educational legislation of the 2007 North Carolina General Assembly, including appropriations; enrollment and attendance; student issues that include students with disabilities, suspensions, and reassignment appeals; and miscellaneous legislation, including school funding disputes.
Full Text:
Record #:
10254
Author(s):
Abstract:
Joyce discusses the 2007 North Carolina General Assembly's legislation as it applies to appropriations and salaries, student relationships and financial aid, and university and community college governance.
Full Text:
Record #:
11101
Abstract:
The new Higher Learning Consolidation Act, passed by the North Carolina General Assembly in October 1971, created a new University of North Carolina. Under it, the university will be governed by a central board with tight control over all the sixteen institutions which are part of the new system. This article is structured in a question-answer format.
Source:
We the People of North Carolina (NoCar F 251 W4), Vol. 29 Issue 12, Dec 1971, p38-39, 47-48, il
Record #:
12496
Abstract:
The 1985 North Carolina General Assembly authorized the new Basic Education Program, which is now in the second year of an eight-year implementation schedule. The program seeks to improve public school education. This article provides a brief outline of its components, its origins, its timetable, and its likely effects on students now and in the future.
Source:
We the People of North Carolina (NoCar F 251 W4), Vol. 44 Issue 9, Sept 1986, p16, 18, 20, il, por
Record #:
12497
Abstract:
Dr. Howard Maniloff joined the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction in 1983 as special assistant for policy development. Dr. Craig Phillips, state school superintendent, asked him to coordinate the development of the new Basic Education Program. Dr. Maniloff discusses the program in this We the People of North Carolina magazine interview.
Source:
We the People of North Carolina (NoCar F 251 W4), Vol. 44 Issue 9, Sept 1986, p20, 22, 24, 47-48, por