NCPI Workmark
Articles in regional publications that pertain to a wide range of North Carolina-related topics.

Search Results


5 results for "Lundsford, L. Thomas"
Currently viewing results 1 - 5
PAGE OF 1
Record #:
35091
Abstract:
Thomas Lundsford related the irony of the State Bar, the watchdog for North Carolina’s legal profession, finding itself on the other side of the counsel table through lawsuits by lawyers facing charges such as disbarment and decertification.
Record #:
35104
Abstract:
The Bates that Lunsford in this case referred to a United States Supreme court case that took twenty years to be resolved. The case, Bates vs Arizona State Bar, involved protection of the First Amendment to the commercial speech (as in, advertisement) of lawyers’ services. The issue was resolved by offering two proposals: proposal A, one which required certain information to be disclosed about the lawyer; proposal B, which prohibited advertising that was false, deceptive, or misleading.
Record #:
41209
Abstract:
Lundsford related the irony of the State Bar, the watchdog for North Carolina’s legal profession, finding itself on the other side of the counsel table through lawsuits by lawyers facing charges such as disbarment and decertification.
Record #:
41210
Abstract:
Though the classic film is referenced to and inspired the author’s view of the legal profession, The executive director of the North Carolina State Bar’s account is truly about how the State Bar contributes to the value and roles of legal representatives of the Old North State.
Record #:
41217
Abstract:
To serve and protect the interests of NC’s people entails serving a variety of purposes, some of which are regulatory and others professional. As the author, Executive Director of the North Carolina State Bar, attested, a variety of purposes can result in challenges such as conflicts of interests between public interest and professional concerns.