NCPI Workmark
Articles in regional publications that pertain to a wide range of North Carolina-related topics.

Search Results


29 results for "Crowell, Michael "
Currently viewing results 1 - 15
PAGE OF 2
Next
Record #:
30016
Abstract:
This is the first in a series of memoranda summarizing acts of the 1977 North Carolina General Assembly that affect criminal law and procedure. Two of the most important motor vehicle law changes are included, as well as several matters concerning jails and prisons.
Source:
Administration of Justice Memorandum (NoCar KFN 7908 .A15 U6), Vol. Issue 4, Aug 1977, p1-23, f
Record #:
30018
Abstract:
This is the second in a series of memoranda summarizing acts of the 1977 North Carolina General Assembly that affect criminal law and procedure. Discussion focuses on legislation relating to new crimes, punishment, probation, restitution, and youthful offenders.
Source:
Record #:
29995
Abstract:
This memorandum summarizes the acts of the 1979 session of the General Assembly that affect criminal law and procedure. The acts which are discussed go into effect by October 1, 1979.
Source:
Record #:
29999
Abstract:
This is the second in a series of memoranda summarizing acts of the 1979 General Assembly affecting criminal law and procedure. This publication concerns acts that go into effect on or after October 1, 1979.
Source:
Record #:
20281
Author(s):
Abstract:
This bulletin reviews the constitutional and statutory law on public access to court records in North Carolina and also discusses whether North Carolina courts might recognize a judicial privilege for judges' notes and drafts.
Source:
Administration of Justice Bulletin (NoCar KFN 7908 .A15 U6), Vol. Issue 1, June 2012, p1-13, f
Full Text:
Record #:
29994
Author(s):
Abstract:
Over the years, the United States Supreme Court, the appellate courts of North Carolina, and the North Carolina legislature have developed certain rules for conducting arson investigations. All of these rules involve balancing law enforcement’s interest in investigating apparent crimes with the property owner’s expectation of privacy. This article is a brief summary of those rules.
Source:
Record #:
18317
Author(s):
Abstract:
Perhaps the most important and certainly the most talked about decision of the United State Supreme court was its approval of the death penalty for murder in the statutes of Georgia, Florida, and Texas, and disapproval of it under the laws of North Carolina and Louisiana. This article summarizes the Court's reasons for its decisions and to outline the North Carolina General Assembly's limited options if it wants to restore capital punishment.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 42 Issue 3, Winter 1977, p2-5, 14, f
Subject(s):
Record #:
19999
Author(s):
Abstract:
Effective January 1, 1978, all measurements of alcoholic beverages in North Carolina were to be converted to metric size. As a result various crime laws have been restated in metric terms. This memorandum explains the change that took place on January 1 and provides tables for law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and judicial officials to use in determining whether the liquor laws are being violated.
Source:
Administration of Justice Memorandum (NoCar KFN 7908 .A15 U6), Vol. Issue 2, Jan 1978, p1-5, il
Record #:
18163
Abstract:
When the 1973 North Carolina General Assembly convened in January it was faced with a U.S. Supreme Court decision that raised doubts about the constitutionality of North Carolina's capital punishment statutes. The problem lay in allowing juries discretion to choose between life imprisonment and death for the same crime. Ultimately, the jury's option to recommend life imprisonment was removed, leaving mandatory death penalties for first-degree murder, arson, rape, and first-degree burglary.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 39 Issue 9, June 1973, p30-38
Subject(s):
Record #:
18187
Author(s):
Abstract:
The traditional way of handling someone who has committed a crime is to place them under arrest and either release him on money bail or keep him in jail until trial. It is being suggested that some of these people not be incarcerated at all. This article examines the alternatives to imprisonment and how changes are effecting current law in North Carolina.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 40 Issue 2, Fall 1974, p16-26
Record #:
29971
Author(s):
Abstract:
In a recent 1981 decision, United States Supreme Court recently held that a police officer may not enter a home to make a routine felony arrest unless he has an arrest warrant. This memorandum reviews the Court’s decision and explains its effect on North Carolina law.
Source:
Record #:
19970
Author(s):
Abstract:
This bulletin attempts to explain when modification of another judge's order is allowed and when it not.
Source:
Record #:
20274
Author(s):
Abstract:
It is commonly believed that one trial judge may not overrule another. The rule is more complicated than this simple phrase implies. Judges often consider matters previously reviewed by another judge, especially in superior court where regular rotation of judges is the norm. Generally, one trial judge should not change the legal ruling of another judge. This bulletin explains when modification of another judge's order is allowed and when it is not. This Bulletin updates Administration of Justice Bulletin #2008/02.
Source:
Full Text:
Record #:
19981
Author(s):
Abstract:
In North Carolina the commonly stated rule, for both criminal and civil cases in both superior and district court, is that a judgment or order affecting substantial rights may not be entered without the consent of the parties (1) after the session of court has expired, or (2) while the judge is out of the county or district. Actually, there are many instances when orders may be entered out-of-session and out-of-county, especially in civil cases. This bulletin describes the instances when court orders may be entered out-of-term, out-of-session, and out-of-county.
Source:
Subject(s):
Record #:
20000
Author(s):
Abstract:
Legislation enacted by the 1977 North Carolina General Assembly converted all state liquor offenses to metric terms effective January 1, 1978. Crowell explains some problems that have arisen in the application of the law and how to avoid them.
Source:
Administration of Justice Memorandum (NoCar KFN 7908 .A15 U6), Vol. Issue 5, May 1978, p1-3, il