SACS CRITERIA:MAJOR SECTIONS: KKK KKKKKKKKEKKKEKEKRKKEKE KKK KKKEK 1. INSTITUTIONAL PURPOSE 2. INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS 3. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM 4, EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES 5. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES FURTHER BREAKDOWNS: 1. INSTITUTIONAL PURPOSE (Chair + 4 members) 2. INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS (Chair + 4 members) 2.1 Planning and Evaluation 2.2 Institutional Research DUCATIONAL PROGRAM (Chair + 5 subcommittee chairs) -1 Undergraduate Program +4 members Graduate Program +4 members Continuing Education, Outreach and Service Programs +4 members Faculty + 4 members Consortial and Contractual Relationships + 4 members . EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES (Chair + 6 subcommittee chairs) 4.1 Educational Support Services + 4 members 4.2 Library + 4 members 4.3 Instructional Support + 4 members 4.4 Computer Resources and Services’ + 4 members 4.5 Student Development Services + 4 members 4.6 Intercollegiate Athletics + 4 members . ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES (Chair + 5 subcommittee chairs) 5.1 Organization and Administration + 4 members Institutional Advancement + 4 members Financial Resources + 4 members Physical Resources + 4 members Externally Funded Grants and Contracts + 4 members 93 members of working committees 1990-92 SACS SELF-STUDY CALENDAR KKEKKKKKEKEKKKKRKEREKREEERERREREREKRKER Jan-Feb, 1990: Position descriptions for Director and Assistant to the Director; Steering Committee structure, charge, appointments; Working Com- mittee structure; Report to Chancellor's Staff; Faculty Senate; Council of Deans; prepare for Dr. David Carter's visit March-April, 1990: March 5-6 visit by Dr. Carter with Chancellor, Chancellor's staff; Council of Deans; and with the Steering Committee; Appointment of the 88 committee members (total = 110); writing of Working Committee charges and initial meetings of Working Committees Summer, 1990: Drafting and approval of all Working Committee work plans for 1990-91, in coordination with the writing of departmental and program area guidelines for planning process activities. Completion of "The Proposal for the ECU SACS Self-Study, 1990-92" Fall and Spring, 1990-91: The working Committees draft reports under each "must" amd "should" in their area of the Criteria #1 -#5. The working committees will draw on reports submitted from each department and program area in in the University as well as from reports from each Strategic Planning Unit. Summer, 1991: Working Committee reports will be collated and drafted into a single report Fall, 1991: The report will be approved by the respective working committees and the Steering Committee and presented to the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs. After final University approval from the Chancellor and the Chancellor's staff, the report will be sent to SACS in November, 1991. Spring, 1992: Arrangements will be made for the Visiting Committee. The visit will be sometime between February and April. Follow-up details and responses will be coordinated immediately. Summer, Fall, 1992: Follow-up details completed in time for the SACS Commission on Colleges' vote on ECU's reaffirmation of accreditation in December, 1992. Unit Plan Development Process Strategic Planning Units Academic Planning Units Support Planning Units Vice Chancellor - Academic Affairs Chancellor School of Art Student Life College of Arts & Sciences School of Business Institutional Advancement School of Education General College & Undergraduate Studies Business Affairs Graduate School & Research School of Home Economics School of Industry & Technology School of Music School of Social Work Academic Library Services Continuing Education & Summer School Vice Chancellor - Health Sciences School of Allied Health Sciences School of Medicine School of Nursing Health Sciences Library Ballot # | TELLERS" REPORT rey ee es ae ie ELECTION FOR: NOMINATING COMMITTEE FOR FACULTY SENATE OFFICERS ff of Ballot Sheets Received UL ## of Votes Necessary for Majority Vote Nominees For illegal ballots ## of Votes I7+ae trl = YL ly +a¢ ihe | if 44¢. +f = 4G (7.4322) +{ = % if * sJt = 4S D | Lua in On VU