ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FACULTY COMPUTER COMMITTEE DATES* April: 26741983 Tis Conner Atkeson, Chair of the Faculty FROM: Chuck Ziehr, Chair and Corre Garrett, Secretary Membership of the committee (including ex-officio members). Ex-officio: Representative of Faculty Senate Chair--Jim Joyce Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs or an appointed representative--Trenton Davis until 12- 21-87 then Ruth Katz Vice Chancellor for Institutional Advancement or an appointed representative--unfilled Director of the Computing Center--Larry Wester until 1-88 then Blake Price (Ernie Marshburn, Manager of Academic Computing also attends) Harry Birch, Aerospace Stephen Brock, Student Kathy Chan, Health Sciences Library Dorothy Clayton, Political Science, Vice-Chair Marie Farr, English Corre Garrett, Nursing, Secretary Monte Hedges, Student Richard Kerns, Business Frank Lawler, Medicine James Wirth, Mathematics Charles Ziehr, Geography & Planning, Chair Committee meetings (dates and members absent). August 19, 1987 Birch, Lawler, Wirth, students September 14, 1987 Birch, Brock, Hedges, Joyce October 12, 1987 Brock, Farr, Garrett, Hedges, Wester, Wirth November 16, 1987 Hedges, Lawler, Wester December 7, 1987 Chan, Garrett, Joyce, Wirth January 25, 1988 Brock, Hedges, Lawler February 22, 1988 Chan, Farr March 28, 1988 (regular meeting and interview with CIS Director candidate) Brock, Hedges, Joyce, Lawler, Price March 30, 1988 (interview with CIS Director candidate) Brock, Farr, Garrett, Hedges, Joyce, Lawler Apri 25, 71988 Farr, Hedges, Lawler, Wirth Date of reports to the Faculty Senate during the year. December 1, 1987 Specific instructions, if any, given to the committee by the Faculty Senate, other than those found in the committee’s Constitutional charge. None A brief statement of committee organization, subcommittees, research activities, etc. The FCC serves to make recommendations regarding academic computing to the Faculty Senate, CIS, and ISAC. Subcommittees active this academic year: External use of academic computing resources policy Academic computer lab policy . Annual Tel. Mole. Signed: Report of the Faculty Computer Committee, page 2 List of committee accomplishments including recommendations made to agencies other than the Faculty Senate. 1. A policy to regulate the external use of academic computing resources was developed and submitted to ISAC (eventually modified slightly and adopted). 2. Recommended that ISAC remove the FCC from the approval process for computing hardware and software (implemented). 3. Recommended to the Committee on Committees that our ex- officio membership be revised to include only: Chair of the Faculty Senate, Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, Director of Computing and Information Systems (or their rep. ). 4. Submitted a policy to ISAC to regulate academic computer labs which are supported in full or in part by CIS. , Investigated how “academic computing” funds are being spent by CIS and began an on-going dialog with CIS regarding priorities for the use of these funds. 6. Recommended to the Unified Computer Planning Committee (Dick Edwards, chair) that more funds be made available for academic computing needs and that funds budgeted for academic computing actually be spent on academic computing. 7. Recommended to Business Affairs that microcomputer insurance remain optional for departmental microcomputers. 8. Recommended to the CIS Director Search Committee that more candidates be interviewed before a decision is made. 9. Submitted a resolution to ISAC requesting that the CIS budget for computing be presented to the FCC for its comments near the beginning of each academic year. 10. Reviewed and approved a policy proposed by CIS to regulate temporary access to academic computing resources by visiting faculty/staff. 11. Submitted a resolution to ISAC, Facilities Committee, and the University planner requesting that high priority be given to additional computer lab space when new and/or remodeled space is made available. Citation of the resolution numbers of Senate resolutions that originated with the committee. None Proposals and/or business to be carried over to next year. Continued discussion with CIS regarding academic computing priorities. Revise the FCC handbook for committee members. Evaluation of the committee A. Structure -- The structure appears to be adequate. B. Duties -- Committee duties are appropriately defined. C. Functions -- The commmittee functions efficiently and effectively; our relationships with ISAC and CIS have been good and show signs of growing even stronger. Personnel -- Most members attend regularly and contribute effectively to the mission of the committee. Suggestions for improving the effectiveness of the committee. None Chairperson Clb Jobe Seta aee, Secretary _ Cou Vana