EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY

a GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27834

OFFICE OF THE CHANCELLOR
February 1, 1983

Dr. Ronald Thiele
Chair, Chancellor's Advisory Committee

on Unit Codes
East Carolina University

Dear Dr. Thiele:

Attached are amendments to the Philosophy Department Code which
have been approved by the Senate. I would appreciate your critique
before I take action.

Sincerely,

Mee) PORE
Coe 4

& John M. Howell
Chancellor

JMH/ ra
enclosure

cc: or. Caroline Ayers

East Carolina University is a constituent institution of
The University of North Carolina

 
Amendment to Philosophy Department Code:

(Appropriately approved in Department November 16, 1982)

I¥. Evaluations

A. Annual evalustions

lL. At the end of each academic year, the chairperson shali formulate a
evaluation of each faculty member in accordance with the East Caro}
University Faculty Mamual, Appendix C III on the basis of evidence
in hand for accomplishments in the three categories of teaching,
research/cresative activity and service as these are specified in %!
Guidelines of the Department.

In the evalustion, teaching shall bave a weight of LO, research/
creative ectivity shail have a weight of 40, and service shall have
a weight of 20. For members with fixed term appointment, however,
tesachive shall nave a weight of 50, and research/creative activity

shall have e veight of 50.

The evaluation shell not take into account either the number of
hours of teaching responsibility, not any special opportunity
provided to a faculty member, such as released time for teaching, «

the revard of 4 grant.

It shall be the responsibility of each faculty member to insure tb
appropriate evidence of accomplishments in the three categories
named in (1) is in the member's ‘Personnel File for consultation by

the chairperson and the Personnel Committee.

The chairperson shall inform the Personnel Committee of any and al?
annual evaluations before these are sutmitted to the Administratio:.
If the Personnel Committee agrees with the unit chairperson's
evaluations, it shall so inform the Administration. If the Person:
Committee disagrees with the evaluations, end the disagreement
cannot be resolved through consultation between the unit chairpersc
and the Personnel Committee, the Personnel Committee has the
prerogative of submitting to the Administration its own recommen-~
dations, formulated in accord with the Committee's bylaws.

B. The Quedrennial Evaluation: (no change)

V. Salary

A. The unit chairperson shall base any and all recommendations for merit
salery increments on the annual evaluation specified in IV.A.

B. The unit chairperson shall inform the Personnel Committee of any and a:
merit salery increment recommendations before those are submitted to th
Administration. If the Pergonnel Committee agrees with the recommen~
dations of the unit chairperson, it shall so inform the Administration.
If the Personnel Committee disagrees with the recommendations, and the
disagreement cannot be resolved through consultation between the unit
chairperson and the Personnel Committee, the Personnel Committee has the
prerogative of sutmittins to the Administration its own recommendati:
formulated in accord with the Committee's bylews.

 
(2)

The unit chairperson shall request supplemental funds from the

Administration for any member whose salary, in the judgement of the
unit chairperson and the Personnel Committee, does not reflect the
menber's extraordinary merit in the three categories named in IV.B.

adjust subsequent Roman mmerals. }