NCPI Workmark
Articles in regional publications that pertain to a wide range of North Carolina-related topics.

Search Results


5 results for North Carolina State Bar Journal Vol. 22 Issue 2, Summer 2017
Currently viewing results 1 - 5
PAGE OF 1
Record #:
42556
Author(s):
Abstract:
This landmark court case, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 2017, brought to this nation’s legal profession’s attention how it should handle information related to jurors such as racial identity. Grine notes in particular how lawyers handle this issue during the voir dire step of the jury selection process can help prevent racial bias in juries and uphold the Sixth Amendment. How racial bias in juries for North Carolina cases is provided by the author in citing the manual Raising Issues of Race in North Carolina Criminal Cases.
Record #:
42557
Abstract:
A state law passed in 2016 allows digital assets to be accessed by fiduciaries. Examined within the context of this legislation by Carter are four types of fiduciaries, the process involved in granting authorization, examples of print and electronic documentation involved in the process, how fiduciaries may be able to access assets if it was not prepared before the owner died or became incapacitated. Provided also by the author is a copy of the Digital Access—Authorization and Consent for Release form created by a lawyer from Minnesota.
Record #:
42558
Author(s):
Abstract:
Lawyers in the legislature, present since the beginning of the North Carolina General Assembly and the state’s one-party system, is noted by Daughtry. The extent of their presence and impact is emphasized by statistical data for the number of attorneys in the state House and Senate. It is also asserted by reasons why lawyers are needed in, and can be beneficial to, the operation of this General Assembly and the state’s political system, over the years evolved into a two-party system.
Record #:
42559
Author(s):
Abstract:
In the case of trials by jury, Wilson notes the decreasing number of trials with juries in recent years. From this admission leads to him acknowledging how lawyers’ inadequate court trial experience also impacts the quality of court trials. It is the lack thereof, that, according to the author, lawyers are obligated to acknowledge to their clients, per State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct.
Record #:
42560
Author(s):
Abstract:
Popularly touted in recent years to help combat anxiety, depression, and stress, Mahr proposes that lawyers can benefit from this form of meditation when combatting the stress generated from their work experience. As evidence for the need and potential benefits, the author notes lawyer participants in a study who reported a considerable impact to their work performance and stress levels, as well as a source providing more information about the practice. In fact, from such studies and resources, Mahr, herself a beneficiary of mindfulness, was encouraged to start up a Mindfulness Meditation to Build Resilience to Stress curriculum for lawyers.