NCPI Workmark
Articles in regional publications that pertain to a wide range of North Carolina-related topics.

Search Results


11 results for Texasgulf
Currently viewing results 1 - 11
PAGE OF 1
Record #:
5529
Author(s):
Abstract:
The Southern Environmental Law Center provides a point-by-point argument against Texasgulf's proposed phosphate mining in Beaufort County wetlands and its environmental impact statement.
Source:
Currents (NoCar TD 171.3 P3 P35x), Vol. 12 Issue 3, Spring 1994, pp4-5
Record #:
9813
Author(s):
Abstract:
The Texasgulf Company has the right to mine phosphate, the key ingredient in fertilizer, from a 40,000-acre plot of land close to Aurora. Combined with sulphuric acid, phosphate becomes phosphoric acid, and the plant ships it product to customers who make liquid fertilizers, such as those used by the state's farmers. The company has spent six million dollars on pollution control and monitoring equipment. It has also given Smithsonian Institution paleontologists the right to search the site for prehistoric fossils, such as sharks.
Source:
The State (NoCar F 251 S77), Vol. 43 Issue 3, Aug 1975, p13-14, il
Full Text:
Record #:
25165
Author(s):
Abstract:
Texasgulf Chemicals has been reissued a permit it is not happy with. However, those looking out for the Clean Water Act feel it isn’t strict enough.
Source:
Currents (NoCar TD 171.3 P3 P35x), Vol. 6 Issue 3, Spring 1987, p8
Record #:
25187
Author(s):
Abstract:
Texasgulf Chemicals Company has delivered its environmental report for their future mining plans. This report is being reviewed by several organizations including the Pamlico-Tar River Foundation.
Source:
Currents (NoCar TD 171.3 P3 P35x), Vol. 11 Issue 1, Fall 1991, p2, il
Record #:
25190
Author(s):
Abstract:
The Pamlico-Tar River Foundation has several plans for the Texasgulf environmental report. In addition they plan to write up these ideas in their own document to suggest what Texasgulf may or may not be allowed to do.
Source:
Currents (NoCar TD 171.3 P3 P35x), Vol. 11 Issue 2, Winter 1992, p2
Record #:
25206
Author(s):
Abstract:
While the Pamlico-Tar River Foundation and Texasgulf have never gotten along, their relationship has developed into a cordial one if still adversarial.
Source:
Currents (NoCar TD 171.3 P3 P35x), Vol. 13 Issue 1, Fall 1993, p3
Record #:
25214
Author(s):
Abstract:
The Pamlico-Tar River Foundation details its aims with the Environmental Conservation Statement it made regarding Texasgulf’s request to mine in the wetlands.
Source:
Currents (NoCar TD 171.3 P3 P35x), Vol. 13 Issue 3, Spring 1994, p1
Record #:
25215
Author(s):
Abstract:
The Pamlico-Tar River Foundation delivers the options and their consequences regarding the request of the Texasgulf company to mine over 3,000 acres of wetlands in Beaufort County.
Source:
Currents (NoCar TD 171.3 P3 P35x), Vol. 13 Issue 3, Spring 1994, p2
Record #:
25216
Author(s):
Abstract:
The Southern Environmental Law Center has prepared a detailed statement on the legal side of the Texasgulf and Pamlico-Tar River Foundation conflict regarding the mining of phosphate from many wetlands in Beaufort County.
Source:
Currents (NoCar TD 171.3 P3 P35x), Vol. 13 Issue 3, Spring 1994, p4-5
Record #:
25217
Author(s):
Abstract:
Various agencies voice their concerns and comments on the Texasgulf request to mine phosphate from several wetlands.
Source:
Currents (NoCar TD 171.3 P3 P35x), Vol. 13 Issue 4, Summer 1994, p1-2
Subject(s):
Record #:
32442
Author(s):
Abstract:
David C. Edmisten is vice president of Texasgulf’s Agricultural Chemicals Division in Raleigh. This article discusses Edmisten’s background in chemical engineering, and operations of the company. Texasgulf is mining phosphate rock at Lee Creek in Aurora for the development of fertilizer.
Source: