NCPI Workmark
Articles in regional publications that pertain to a wide range of North Carolina-related topics.

Search Results


7 results for "Property rights--Legislation"
Currently viewing results 1 - 7
PAGE OF 1
Record #:
29963
Author(s):
Abstract:
A new bill passed in 1981 allows North Carolina residents to claim a substantially greater amount of their property to be exempt from seizure and sale to pay off judgments against them than they formerly held. This memorandum discusses the legislation and the authority of sheriffs under this new law.
Source:
Administration of Justice Memorandum (NoCar KFN 7908 .A15 U6), Vol. Issue 7, Oct 1981, p1-21, f
Record #:
17364
Author(s):
Abstract:
During the 1930s, the Federal Government was condemning large portions of North Carolina lands, especially in the western mountain areas. Governmental officials were able to do this because of three discrepancies in the title documents; Vague Description, Formal Defects in Deeds, and Failure to Record Deeds. Mr. Gardner describes each of these legal terms and how state property owners could be affected.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 3 Issue 2, Nov 1935, p7, 19, por
Record #:
30370
Author(s):
Abstract:
North Carolina has recently evaluated potential issues associated with oil and gas exploration and production in the state. One of those issues involves the relationship of subsurface rights and residential mortgages. This article discusses limitations and recommendations for acquiring oil and gas rights, and issuing mortgage loans on residential property.
Source:
Carolina Banker (HG 2153 N8 C66), Vol. 91 Issue 2, Summer 2012, p64-67, por, map
Record #:
15958
Author(s):
Abstract:
As the hog farm industry grows in North Carolina, so do the environmental implications that accompany it. This article examines the environmental dangers that the hog farm industry poses to North Carolina's rivers and streams, and addresses the legal protections against regulation by state and federal legislatures against prevention and protection.
Source:
Carolina Planning (NoCar HT 393 N8 C29x), Vol. 22 Issue 1, Fall 1996, p10-18
Full Text:
Record #:
28713
Abstract:
The United States Supreme Court case of First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, California involved a flood-plain regulation that prevented rebuilding on a tract where a major flood had washed away buildings on the plaintiff’s campground. When a local government adopts an unconstitutional taking, it must pay the property owner compensation.
Source:
Local Government Law Bulletin (NoCar KFN 7830 A15 L6), Vol. Issue 29, July 1987, p1-3, f
Full Text:
Record #:
17690
Abstract:
Resident voted on two state constitutional amendments on January 14, 1964. The first concerning legislative representation failed but the second dealt with married women's right to property and passed. The amendment gives a married woman the right to convey her property without the consent of her husband.
Source:
Record #:
28714
Author(s):
Abstract:
The United States Supreme Court decision in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission declared an unconstitutional taking of a small beachfront property for a public access easement. The implications of the case for North Carolina governments emphasize the rights of private property and coastal development regulations.
Source:
Local Government Law Bulletin (NoCar KFN 7830 A15 L6), Vol. Issue 30, Aug 1987, p1-6, f
Full Text: