Articles in regional publications that pertain to a wide range of North Carolina-related topics.
Search Results
5 results
for White, Katherine
Currently viewing results 1 - 5
|
PAGE
OF 1
|
Record #:
244
Author(s):
Abstract:
The judgment in the recent case of Woodson v. Rowland expanded an injured worker's ability to win claims against employers for work-place injuries.
Source:
North Carolina Insight
(NoCar JK 4101 N3x), Vol. 14 Issue 1, May 1992,
p102-1-5, bibl, f
Periodical Website
Subject(s):
Full Text:
Record #:
335
Author(s):
Abstract:
Two new Supreme Court members and a new chief justice, added to the current members, give the North Carolina Supreme Court a new look.
Source:
North Carolina Insight
(NoCar JK 4101 N3x), Vol. 9 Issue 3, Mar 1987,
p86-91, por
Periodical Website
Subject(s):
Full Text:
Record #:
1420
Author(s):
Abstract:
In Doe v. Holt, the N.C. Supreme Court ruled for the first time that children may sue their parents for inflicting willful and malicious injuries. This decision invites the General Assembly to clarify the doctrine of parent-child immunity.
Source:
North Carolina Insight
(NoCar JK 4101 N3x), Vol. 15 Issue 1, Jan 1994,
p62-67, por, f
Periodical Website
Subject(s):
Full Text:
Record #:
1909
Author(s):
Abstract:
White examines some of the high points and low points of the North Carolina Supreme Court during its first 175 years, including such issues as free speech, civil rights, and jail conditions.
Source:
North Carolina Insight
(NoCar JK 4101 N3x), Vol. 15 Issue 2-3, Sept 1994,
p106-112
Periodical Website
Subject(s):
Full Text:
Record #:
7438
Author(s):
Abstract:
Recent rulings by the North Carolina Supreme Court has forced the state to surrender $1.5 billion in realized revenue. The fiscal impact of the rulings is large and comes at a time when the state government is experiencing revenue shortfalls. White examines the following three cases that have had, and will continue to have, a large fiscal impact on North Carolina government:\r\nBAILEY V. NORTH CAROLINA, which concerned taxing of state retirees' pensions; SMITH V. STATE, which canceled the state's intangibles tax and the return of $600 million to taxpayers; and LEANDRO V. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, which stated that every child in North Carolina is entitled to a sound basic education.
Source:
North Carolina Insight
(NoCar JK 4101 N3x), Vol. 21 Issue 4, Mar 2005,
p90-99, il, f
Periodical Website
Subject(s):
Full Text: