NCPI Workmark
Articles in regional publications that pertain to a wide range of North Carolina-related topics.

Search Results


31 results for "Green, Philip P., Jr"
Currently viewing results 1 - 15
PAGE OF 3
Next
Record #:
525
Abstract:
Albert Coates is the founder of the Institute of Government at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and he remains active in the program.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 54 Issue 4, Spring 1989, p2-8, il, por, bibl, f
Record #:
20524
Abstract:
In a two month period the North Carolina Supreme Court make two of its most important zoning decisions. This bulletin discusses those decisions.
Source:
Local Government Law Bulletin (NoCar KFN 7830 A15 L6), Vol. Issue 34, Nov 1988, p1-7, f
Subject(s):
Full Text:
Record #:
28718
Abstract:
The North Carolina Supreme Court made two important zoning decisions in Chrismon v. Guilford County and Hall v. City of Durham. The case rulings now allow special use district zoning techniques, and extensively clarified the spot zoning and contract zoning doctrines.
Source:
Local Government Law Bulletin (NoCar KFN 7830 A15 L6), Vol. Issue 34, Nov 1988, p1-7, f
Full Text:
Record #:
28713
Abstract:
The United States Supreme Court case of First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, California involved a flood-plain regulation that prevented rebuilding on a tract where a major flood had washed away buildings on the plaintiff’s campground. When a local government adopts an unconstitutional taking, it must pay the property owner compensation.
Source:
Local Government Law Bulletin (NoCar KFN 7830 A15 L6), Vol. Issue 29, July 1987, p1-3, f
Full Text:
Record #:
18403
Abstract:
Spot zoning is zoning that does not accord with a comprehensive plan or is sharply different from the zoning of surrounding or nearby properties, or appears to favor or punish a particular property owner. The concept is rooted in the North Carolina constitutional provisions that prohibit the grant of exclusive privileges.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 51 Issue 1, Summer 1985, p50-53
Record #:
18363
Abstract:
Long recognized as a pioneer in the field of building regulations, North Carolina is now coming to have the most comprehensive program in the country. Its many innovations encompass its building codes, its machinery for enforcement, and its qualification programs for enforcement officials.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 45 Issue 4, Spring 1980, p26-31
Record #:
18181
Abstract:
As the full implications of the environmental crisis become known and as the public recognizes that land, along with water and air, is a limited resource, an exercise has begun in allocating or reallocating the function of land-use planning and regulation among different governmental units--state, regional, and local.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 40 Issue 1, Summer 1974, p17-19
Subject(s):
Record #:
17556
Abstract:
Fourteen counties took the initiative to form city-county planning commissions regulate growth and development. County planning was considered so important to regulate legislation, revenue, and taxes between urban, suburban, and rural areas of each county. The previous two session of the General Assembly granted more of these powers to county officials whom tried to work with local civic groups for the betterment of state counties.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 26 Issue 6-7, Mar-Apr 1960, p2-4, 23, il
Subject(s):
Record #:
17955
Abstract:
A decision of major importance to fast-growing North Carolina cities was handed down by the North Carolina Supreme Court, when it upheld Raleigh's extra-territorial zoning ordinance, which allows cities to extend their ordinances to population growth on their fringes. This decision holds that cities may also validly exclude trailer camps from residence districts in their zoning ordinances.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 24 Issue 6, Mar 1958, p6-8
Subject(s):
Record #:
17925
Abstract:
The North Carolina 1957 General Assembly had a banner year regarding city planning legislation. Foremost among its achievements in this field were acts to make the state's urban redevelopment legislation workable, to authorize the state to embark upon a local planning assistance program, to enact flood zoning ordinances, and clarify building laws.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 24 Issue 1, Sept 1957, p24-26
Record #:
17946
Abstract:
By action of the 1957 General Assembly the state of North Carolina has embarked upon a new role of furnishing, in conjunction with the federal government, technical planning assistance to local governmental units.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 24 Issue 3, Nov 1957, p7-9
Subject(s):
Record #:
17900
Abstract:
North Carolina's first General Assembly to hold a special session since 1938 convened to receive bills and resolutions pertaining to issues raised by the school segregation decisions of the United States Supreme Court. The major part of the legislation enacted consisted of the Pearsall Plan that attempted to undermine desegregation through compulsory plans.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 23 Issue 1, Sept 1956, p4-5, 12, Inside back cover
Record #:
17797
Abstract:
The United States Supreme Court holds that urban redevelopment is constitutional in that it does not interfere with Fifth Amendment provisions. This is excellent news for states like North Carolina who are rapidly developing.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 21 Issue 6, Mar 1955, p5-7, Inside back cover
Record #:
17818
Abstract:
Green discusses the issue of subdivision regulation in North Carolina, with attention to the affect of new national legislation on state laws.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 21 Issue 7, Apr 1955, p9-11
Record #:
17680
Abstract:
The south is in the midst of its greatest industrial boom in history. Given competition for new industries and intensity of development across North Carolina, Green discusses the role of local governments in governing such activities.
Source:
Popular Government (NoCar JK 4101 P6), Vol. 20 Issue 6, Mar 1954, p6-9